The output of a single scenario analysis consists of the stress intensity factors at the deepest point and the surface breaking points along the crack front.
As discussed, the stress intensity factors (K) can then be used in carrying out an Engineering Critical Assessment (ECA) of the crack, for example using a Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) approach.
Analysis Limitations
The validity limits associated with the equations developed in [3] are based on the range of parameters used when developing the detailed finite element analyses that formed the basis of the development of the equations. Due to the polynomial equations that form the basis of the equations, use of the equations outside the validity limits summarized in Table 5.1 should be approached with caution.
As part of the calculation process the software calculates the required geometric ratios and presents a warning to the user when a given ratio is exceeded. The software continues to carry out the calculations, however the results should be used with caution.
References
- In the Matter of an Accident on 19 February 1985 near Camrose, Alberta on the Pipeline System of Interprovincial Pipe Line ”, National Energy Board, Canada, 1986.
- F. Cross and C.A. Robertson, “Northeast U.S. products line upgraded after major line break”, Oil and Gas Journal, February 15 1988, Vol. 86, No. 7, pp 35 40.
- “Development of Sleeve End Fillet Weld Fitness for Service Assessment Tools”, PRCI Contract Num- ber PR-214-114504, April 22, 2016.
- API 579-2/ASME FFS-1 “Fitness-for-Service, American Petroleum Institute and the American Soci- ety of Mechanical Engineers, June 2007.
FAQ
-
This can be attributed to one of the following reasons: Check Out
- Calculation not executed
- Engine Crash
- Update made to input data
-
For multiple pass welds the original hardness gets tempered so the hardness is reduced. The current model predicts a single pass weld so it is a worse case scenario since no tempering has occurred. Check Out
-
The PRCI hardness model is the predicted Vickers hardness of the weld HAZ using a 10-kg load. The hardness curve is based on the Yurioka equations which are based on Vickers hardness with a 10-kg load. Check Out
-
The current model (V 4.2.2) doesnt allow predicting hardness of two different materials. The inability to predict hardness of two different materials is an issue with the current model. Check Out
-
The model does not currently allow for modeling two materials however a current project looking to update the model will allow this option (Hot Tap V5 will have this feature). Check Out
-
Below is a list of all input data entry validation checks that are integrated in the PRCI Hot Tap model. The model runs all the below input data range checks as part of the input data validation loop before the case model is executed. Check Out
-
The reported value used for “Enter Heat Input” entry is the arc energy even though it is referred to as heat input. This has always been an issue since all the historical work on in-service welding always referred to arc energy as heat input and that has continued with this model. How the model addresses different welding process is by the arc efficiency option selection. Check Out