Using the Results

The output of a single scenario analysis consists of the stress intensity factors at the deepest point and the surface breaking points along the crack front.

As discussed, the stress intensity factors (K) can then be used in carrying out an Engineering Critical Assessment (ECA) of the crack, for example using a Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) approach.

Analysis Limitations

The validity limits associated with the equations developed in [3] are based on the range of parameters used when developing the detailed finite element analyses that formed the basis of the development of the equations. Due to the polynomial equations that form the basis of the equations, use of the equations outside the validity limits summarized in Table 5.1 should be approached with caution.

As part of the calculation process the software calculates the required geometric ratios and presents a warning to the user when a given ratio is exceeded. The software continues to carry out the calculations, however the results should be used with caution.

Table 4.1: Geometric Validity Limits

References

  • In the Matter of an Accident on 19 February 1985 near Camrose, Alberta on the Pipeline System of Interprovincial Pipe Line ”, National Energy Board, Canada, 1986.
  • F. Cross and C.A. Robertson, “Northeast U.S. products line upgraded after major line break”, Oil and Gas Journal, February 15 1988, Vol. 86, No. 7, pp 35 40.
  • “Development of Sleeve End Fillet Weld Fitness for Service Assessment Tools”, PRCI Contract Num- ber PR-214-114504, April 22, 2016.
  • API 579-2/ASME FFS-1 “Fitness-for-Service, American Petroleum Institute and the American Soci- ety of Mechanical Engineers, June 2007.

FAQ

  • PRCI Hot Tap results not showing on reports

    This can be attributed to one of the following reasons: Check Out

    1. Calculation not executed
    2. Engine Crash
    3. Update made to input data 
  • PRCI Hot Tap Hardness value for Multipass Welds

    For multiple pass welds the original hardness gets tempered so the hardness is reduced. The current model predicts a single pass weld so it is a worse case scenario since no tempering has occurred. Check Out

  • PRCI Hot Tap Hardness Model

    The PRCI hardness model is the predicted Vickers hardness of the weld HAZ using a 10-kg load. The hardness curve is based on the Yurioka equations which are based on Vickers hardness with a 10-kg load. Check Out

  • How can we account for Sleeve/Fitting material?

    The current model (V 4.2.2) doesnt allow predicting hardness of two different materials. The inability to predict hardness of two different materials is an issue with the current model. Check Out

  • Does the model consider the composition entered in the “Max Hardness” area for both the pipe and the sleeve?

    The model does not currently allow for modeling two materials however a current project looking to update the model will allow this option (Hot Tap V5 will have this feature). Check Out

  • Validation checks enforce in PRCI Hot Tap Model

    Below is a list of all input data entry validation checks that are integrated in the PRCI Hot Tap model. The model runs all the below input data range checks as part of the input data validation loop before the case model is executed. Check Out

  • Clarification on Heat input and Arc energy in Hot Tap Model

    The reported value used for “Enter Heat Input” entry is the arc energy even though it is referred to as heat input. This has always been an issue since all the historical work on in-service welding always referred to arc energy as heat input and that has continued with this model. How the model addresses different welding process is by the arc efficiency option selection. Check Out


Updated on October 10, 2023

Was this article helpful?

Related Articles